Skip to article
Use cases / At the office

At the office · A worked example

Bring order to a case document working folder

When working copies arrive as scans and email attachments, a consistent filename can connect each document to a checked index.

By TreatFiles6 min readLegal teams · Document coordinators

Working-copy document folder alongside a checked case index
Illustrated workflow. The names and files in this story are fictional.

A working folder assembled from scans and downloaded attachments rarely arrives with consistent names. A reviewer looking at scan001 cannot tell which indexed document it represents. Renaming working copies can make navigation clearer, provided the mapping to the source records is retained.

Use a checked document index to name a fictional Cedar case’s working-copy PDFs with a case code, document date and document identifier. Keep source and evidence collections outside this exercise.

TreatFiles applies prepared filenames. It does not determine a document’s date, assess legal significance, create a chain-of-custody record or establish compliance.

What the names need to say

A case code limits ambiguity across matters. The document date comes from the checked index, and a stable identifier connects the file back to that index. Where names may be shared outside the team, choose labels that do not unnecessarily expose personal details.

CaseCode_Date_Index
Four files, before and after
Original filenameProposed filename
scan001.pdfCEDAR_2026-08-12_D001.pdf
email attachment.pdfCEDAR_2026-08-19_D002.pdf
document-final.pdfCEDAR_2026-08-22_D003.pdf
scan002.pdfCEDAR_2026-09-01_D004.pdf

The examples show complete filenames. In TreatFiles’ New File/Folder Name column, normally enter the base name only; the extension is stored separately.

Connect working copies to the index

  1. Separate working copies from source records

    Create a review folder according to your team’s document-handling process. Leave source records and any managed evidence collection unchanged.

  2. Export a list of the working PDFs

    Select Rename mode in TreatFiles and export the working-copy list to XLSX or CSV. Preserve the exported identifying columns.

  3. Use the checked index for the names

    Match each PDF to its case code, document date and stable index identifier. Put the base name in New File/Folder Name, leaving the .pdf extension separate.

  4. Resolve uncertain or repeated records

    Do not invent a date for an undated document or give two records the same identifier. Resolve uncertain mappings against the index before applying names.

  5. Rename and retain the mapping

    Review the edited file list in TreatFiles and apply the rename. Check that each output still maps to its index entry and keep the old-to-new list with the working-folder notes.

If you need the application controls alongside the example, keep the TreatFiles renaming guide or FAQ and user guide open as a reference.

The exceptions matter

A tidy filename does not prove provenance

Retain the source-reference information your team needs. This workflow is a navigation aid for working copies.

A file timestamp may not be the document date

Use the date confirmed in the working index; handle undated material explicitly.

Avoid silently merging duplicate-looking documents

Two scans may represent different records. Investigate them before assigning names or removing anything.

A sample to work from

The Case document copies tab in this workbook contains the example above. Adapt the idea to your own files, or share it with the people who agree your naming convention.

Download the sample workbook (.xlsx) ↓

This is a planning worksheet, not a TreatFiles import file. Generate a rename-ready export in the app, then put your chosen base names into its New File/Folder Name column.

Questions you might have

Should I rename original evidence files?

This guide is limited to working copies. Follow your organization’s process for original or managed records.

Can TreatFiles identify a document’s legal category?

The classifications and dates come from your checked index. This example does not assume document analysis.

Is this a legal records standard?

No. The fictional pattern illustrates a naming workflow; it does not replace the requirements of a matter or organization.